Marriage of J.G.
Client’s spouse was abusive and controlling. Client had concerns regarding the return of her dog as well as receiving her fair allocation of equity in the marital home. Through mediation, we were able to secure an agreement where our client retained her dog and more than her goal allocation of equity from the marital home.
Client’s spouse was abusive and controlling. Client had concerns regarding the return of her dog as well as receiving her fair allocation of equity in the marital home. Through mediation, we were able to secure an agreement where our client retained her dog and more than her goal allocation of equity from the marital home.
Marriage of W.T.
Father of child had serious substance abuse issues but would not voluntarily reduce his parenting time or be honest with our client about his issues. Through investigation and a contested hearing, we were able to prove Father had substance abuse issues and restrict his parenting time while he obtained treatment.
Father of child had serious substance abuse issues but would not voluntarily reduce his parenting time or be honest with our client about his issues. Through investigation and a contested hearing, we were able to prove Father had substance abuse issues and restrict his parenting time while he obtained treatment.
Interest of W.F.
Client’s husband sustained injuries and was on life-support. Without a guardian and conservator to sign necessary paperwork, he was in danger of being sent to a hospital without much-needed oxygen and specialty care. We were able to successfully petition for emergency (and regular) guardianship and special (and regular) conservatorship to ensure the paperwork was signed to keep him in the best medical situation available for his needs.
Client’s husband sustained injuries and was on life-support. Without a guardian and conservator to sign necessary paperwork, he was in danger of being sent to a hospital without much-needed oxygen and specialty care. We were able to successfully petition for emergency (and regular) guardianship and special (and regular) conservatorship to ensure the paperwork was signed to keep him in the best medical situation available for his needs.
People v. K. C
Client was charged with Unlawful Use of Weapons or “Drunk with Gun.” Through client interviews, investigation, and negotiation with the DA, we were able to get a plea to a Deferred Judgment and Sentence with unsupervised probation.
Client was charged with Unlawful Use of Weapons or “Drunk with Gun.” Through client interviews, investigation, and negotiation with the DA, we were able to get a plea to a Deferred Judgment and Sentence with unsupervised probation.
In Re R.S.
Father of child had extreme anger issues. Through a contested hearing, we were able to secure full custody for our client as Father sought treatment for his issues. Later, through mediation, we were able to create a multi-phase parenting plan that provided more parenting time to Father only as time passed and as he continued to show that he could be safe around the child.
Father of child had extreme anger issues. Through a contested hearing, we were able to secure full custody for our client as Father sought treatment for his issues. Later, through mediation, we were able to create a multi-phase parenting plan that provided more parenting time to Father only as time passed and as he continued to show that he could be safe around the child.
Interest of H.K.
Client was accused of neglecting her incapacitated significant other. Though client had been with the significant other for over twelve years, other family members were appointed emergency guardians, and they promptly denied client’s visitation of the protected party. Through a contested hearing, we were able to successfully restore our client’s right to visit her beloved significant other.
Client was accused of neglecting her incapacitated significant other. Though client had been with the significant other for over twelve years, other family members were appointed emergency guardians, and they promptly denied client’s visitation of the protected party. Through a contested hearing, we were able to successfully restore our client’s right to visit her beloved significant other.
People v. A.L
Client was charged with DUI and DUI Per Se. Client’s BAC was .172. Through negotiation with the DA we were able to highlight our client’s good behavior and retention of a driver’s license, ultimately resulting in a plea offer to DWAI
Client was charged with DUI and DUI Per Se. Client’s BAC was .172. Through negotiation with the DA we were able to highlight our client’s good behavior and retention of a driver’s license, ultimately resulting in a plea offer to DWAI
Interest of B.M.
Client and siblings were involved in heated dispute over proper care for aging mother. Through negotiations with Opposing Counsel and our client, we were able to reach a resolution where each sibling would contribute to mother’s care. The result substantially decreased the litigation, making the process far less expensive and tumultuous for all involved.
Client and siblings were involved in heated dispute over proper care for aging mother. Through negotiations with Opposing Counsel and our client, we were able to reach a resolution where each sibling would contribute to mother’s care. The result substantially decreased the litigation, making the process far less expensive and tumultuous for all involved.
Anonymous - Avvo Review
Couldn't have asked for a better attorney. Brynne went out of her way to address my needs in a timely and professional manner. Thank you so much!
Couldn't have asked for a better attorney. Brynne went out of her way to address my needs in a timely and professional manner. Thank you so much!
Estate of J.H.
Client and sister disputed nominations for Guardian and Conservator of their aging mother. Through negotiations with Opposing Counsel and research regarding professional fiduciaries, we were able to reach a full resolution with all parties, including client’s mother. The agreement took a potentially multi-day hearing down to a matter of minutes. Judge complimented all involved on the congenial and professional result.
Client and sister disputed nominations for Guardian and Conservator of their aging mother. Through negotiations with Opposing Counsel and research regarding professional fiduciaries, we were able to reach a full resolution with all parties, including client’s mother. The agreement took a potentially multi-day hearing down to a matter of minutes. Judge complimented all involved on the congenial and professional result.
Sandi H. - Avvo Reviewer
Tremendously helpful. My sister and I were being sued by our brother. With as much pain and heartache we suffered from our loss of another brother and our father Brynne helped in keeping me focused on what was best. Giving us options. We settled out of court, which she helped with, saving us tremendous court costs.
Tremendously helpful. My sister and I were being sued by our brother. With as much pain and heartache we suffered from our loss of another brother and our father Brynne helped in keeping me focused on what was best. Giving us options. We settled out of court, which she helped with, saving us tremendous court costs.
Estate of F.H.
Client and siblings disputed ownership of home and probate assets. We were able to help guide our clients to a mediated resolution, saving them a significant amount of expenses as well as emotional turmoil, and allowing our client to retain the home.
Client and siblings disputed ownership of home and probate assets. We were able to help guide our clients to a mediated resolution, saving them a significant amount of expenses as well as emotional turmoil, and allowing our client to retain the home.
Interest of A.S.
Client and family members disagreed regarding whom to appoint as Conservator for minor. With Client’s thorough research and our knowledge of law, we were able to secure an appointment for our client’s choice of Conservator.
Client and family members disagreed regarding whom to appoint as Conservator for minor. With Client’s thorough research and our knowledge of law, we were able to secure an appointment for our client’s choice of Conservator.
Disclaimer
No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.
No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems.
No Guarantee of Results: Many of the practice summaries and individual attorney biographies on this website describe results obtained in matters handled for Moore & Van Allen clients. These descriptions are meant only to provide information about the activities and experience of our attorneys. They are not intended as a guarantee that the same or similar results can be obtained in every matter undertaken by our attorneys; and you should not assume that a similar result can be obtained in a legal matter of interest to you. The outcome of a particular matter can depend on a variety of factors—including the specific factual and legal circumstances, the ability of opposing counsel, and, often, unexpected developments beyond the control of any client or attorney.
Third Party Websites: As a convenience, this website may provide links to third-party websites. Such linked websites are not under the control of Moore & Van Allen, and Moore & Van Allen assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the contents of such websites.
Authorized Practice of Law: The jurisdictions in which each of our attorneys is licensed to practice are indicated in the individual attorney biographies on this website. The ability of any attorney to engage in any activities on behalf of a client outside that attorney’s states of licensure is subject to state statutes and professional codes and court rules. Moore & Van Allen does not seek, and this website is not intended to solicit, legal employment outside our attorneys’ states of licensure that would constitute the unauthorized practice of law.
For purposes of compliance with South Carolina Rule of Professional Conduct 7.2(d), the Moore & Van Allen PLLC attorneys responsible for the content of this website are Caroline H. Yingling, General Counsel (100 North Tryon Street, Suite 4700, Charlotte, NC 28202), and, with respect to content relating to the Firm's Charleston office or the individual attorneys in that office, Trudy H. Robertson (78 Wentworth Street, Charleston, SC 29401).
Tell Us More
We strive for 100% customer satisfaction. Please kindly tell us more so we can address your concerns.
Please Leave Us a Review
As I’m sure you can imagine, online reviews are invaluable and it would be so helpful if you could share your positive thoughts and your experience on one or all of these sites. This will help potential clients and ultimately help Gant Law grow.
